Glo 910+ vs Rowenta and Beurer Anti-Cellulite Massager
by BlancaShare
Some of you have asked us to share these product comparisons that we have been doing and that have helped us to build our selection of infallible devices.
As you know, we never add anything to our catalog that we haven't tried before, nothing that we don't love, and nothing that we wouldn't recommend to our mothers or sisters, because sharing is living, but we have to share what is really worth sharing.
Which one do we start with?
By unanimous decision, we're going to start with one of our flagship devices, the Glo 910+ . We'll tell you how we got here.
A home-use lipolytic massager isn't exactly groundbreaking; devices have been on the market for years. Their primary purpose is to mobilize adipose tissue affected by cellulite and toxins so they can be eliminated more quickly by the body through the lymphatic system. As a result, skin texture improves, cellulite is reduced, volume is lost, body contour is improved, and circulation is enhanced, among other benefits.
During the massage, different types of pressure and movements are applied to the tissues, directly influencing fat nodules, veins, and lymphatic vessels. Therefore, it is essential that this massage applies a certain amount of pressure and specific movements to achieve our objectives.
When we began our search for a lipolytic massage device, we started with an in-depth analysis of the devices available on the market and identified around eight with this function. Of these, we eliminated five based on an analysis of their technical specifications and customer reviews. That left us with three. We tested the Beurer CM50 massager, the Rowenta anti-cellulite massager (the best-known of the three), and the Glo 910+ (the least known, but the one that piqued our interest the most due to what we had read in its studies).
What do we look for when selecting the best lipolytic massager?
- Power: The most important thing for us was the device's power. Speed and power aren't the same thing; it might spin a lot, but if it lacks power, the massage will be superficial and will stop when you press it. The important thing is that the power is sufficient, and for that, the device needs a good motor. We really noticed the differences as soon as we turned them on.
- Device autonomy : We all prefer wireless devices, but after analyzing them for some time, it's clear that sometimes they need to be plugged in to provide the required power. The important thing here is to choose the most convenient option without sacrificing efficiency.
- Studies that support it: that is, if there are studies and tests that give us assurance that it is a device validated by experts.
- Materials and overall aesthetics: especially the former, which will ultimately impact the device's durability.
- Accessory analysis: check if your accessories enhance the value that the device provides.
- Price: For us, it's not a primary concern as long as it remains within a reasonable range. We understand that good technology comes at a cost and that a home-use device is always more convenient than undergoing treatments at a beauty clinic; therefore, we are flexible in this regard.

Comparison results:
- Power: As we mentioned, we noticed the differences as soon as we turned them on; the Glo 910+ was undoubtedly the most powerful device. We conducted several tests, but it quickly became clear: the Glo 910+ was by far the most powerful of the three at-home lipolytic massagers we analyzed . The Rowenta and Beurer devices stop when pressure is applied against the body. It's unlikely they'll break down fat nodules that way; in fact, they're even less powerful than a manual massage. In other words, the Rowenta and Beurer anti-cellulite massagers are unlikely to help us achieve our goals in terms of reducing accumulated fat, improving cellulite, eliminating fluids, etc.
- Device autonomy without sacrificing effectiveness: the Rowenta anti-cellulite massager is cordless and, in fact, waterproof. When we tested it in the wet, we found that it glides smoothly and the massage is even gentler. It needs to be charged after each use and lasts for about 20 minutes of massage, although after 5-10 minutes you can feel the power starting to decrease. The Beurer operates while plugged into the mains, and we were surprised by its power because we had expected more from a corded device. The Glo, however, only works when plugged in, which is normal for a device that operates at 800 rpm. The cable is long, providing some freedom of movement.
- Supporting studies: we could only find studies for the Glo 910+. Clearly, a great deal of effort has been put into creating a device that stands out from existing devices due to its proven effectiveness.
- Materials and overall aesthetics: the materials used in the three lipolytic massagers—Rowenta, Beurer, and Glo 910+—are quite good. The first two are lighter devices, while the Glo 910+ is heavier due to the weight of its powerful motor.
- Accessory Analysis: The Glo 910+ includes four attachments: the main serrated attachment, which is also included in Rowenta and Beurer body massagers, as well as a lymphatic drainage attachment, an exfoliating attachment, and a massage attachment. The latter is particularly useful as it allows for massages of the lower back, neck, swollen legs, and more. We believe these attachments make it a much more complete device, enabling a greater number of treatments with a single device. Additionally, the Glo 910+ includes infrared red LED light therapy, which is truly effective in improving skin texture and promoting collagen and elastin production.
- Price: Beurer is the most economical, followed by Rowenta, and then Glo. In any case, as we mentioned before, we still think it's reasonable to buy Glo for €329 since a massage voucher at any clinic would already exceed this amount.

Conclusions:
Without a doubt , the Glo 910+ is the best of the devices analyzed and to date remains the most powerful device we have tested . Its materials are of high quality, it is not self-contained because it is incompatible with its power level, but the cable is long enough and its four massage heads make it a very complete device.
The Glo 910+ is a truly effective device for treating accumulated fat, cellulite, fluid retention, improving circulation, and providing massage, among other benefits . Studies support its effectiveness, and the device has clearly undergone extensive development to ensure that its power, which is key in this case, is sufficient to deliver results within the first 3-5 uses.